[Home]Ticket Stub

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences

The Encyclopaedia has now been locked; contributors must log in to make changes. [more]
Difference (from prior author revision) (major diff, minor diff)

Changed: 1c1
Holding one of these is generally recognised as a sine qua non (that is, sufficiently necessary but not necessarily sufficient) for declaring a holding on a British Rail / London Underground interchange and consequently forcing other players to treat the station as a "pure" (i.e. non-interchange) station.
Holding one of these is generally recognised as a sine qua non (that is, sufficiently necessary but not necessarily sufficient) for declaring a holding on a British Rail / London Underground interchange and consequently forcing other players to treat the station as a 'pure' (i.e. non-interchange) station.

Added: 3a4,5


Categories: A to Z

Holding one of these is generally recognised as a sine qua non (that is, sufficiently necessary but not necessarily sufficient) for declaring a holding on a British Rail / London Underground interchange and consequently forcing other players to treat the station as a 'pure' (i.e. non-interchange) station.

[JLE]


Categories: A to Z

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited April 19, 2007 1:35 am by Simons Mith (diff)
Search: