[Home]History of Fifth Quadranters

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences

The Encyclopaedia has now been locked; contributors must log in to make changes. [more]

Revision 6 . . (edit) March 18, 2009 4:03 pm by Simons Mith [capital letters]
Revision 3 . . (edit) April 1, 2007 3:36 pm by Simons Mith [Categories. Should they be Famous Players as well?]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff)

Changed: 1c1,3
One of the more extremist factions allegedly within CAMREC - though that organisation never acknowledged their existence, they did not expel the members either: composed of a generation even younger than the reformists of 1976, and opposed to their more moderate leadership style. The Quadranters were allegedly formed after the release of the Finsbury Option Amendments of 1988, and with the explicit manifesto of rejecting these amendments: their name stems from the creation, postulated as part of Finsbury, of Quadrant Five as a symbol for all that CAMREC despised about the ruleset - not for the first time in history, a pressure group that could only define itself by what it was against - in this case the logical semantic inconsistency of having five divisions called "Quadrants" (despite the practical use of the division.)
The Fifth Quadranters were rumoured to be one of the more extremist factions present within CAMREC. However, that organisation never acknowledged their existence, and never expelled any of the supposed members. The Fifth Quadranters were a generation younger than the reformists of 1976, and they were strongly opposed to their seniors' more moderate leadership style.

The faction is believed to have formed after the release of the Finsbury Option Amendments of 1988, with the explicit manifesto of rejecting these amendments. Their name stems from the creation, postulated as part of the Amendments, of a quadrant five, which the Quadranters adopted as the symbol of all that they disliked about the ruleset. Not for the first time in history, we see a pressure group that could only define itself by what it was against – in this case the logical semantic inconsistency of having five divisions called 'quadrants', in spite of the significant utility of the proposed division.

Changed: 3c5
When the Holland Park 2000 ruleset was released, the 5th Quadranters were officially disbanded on the grounds that the offensive feature had been removed from the game, at least in its unacceptable form (along with about a third of the rest of the Finsbury Amendments: though the actual Finsbury Option itself, which gave the Amendments their name but formed only a minor part of them, was kept.)
When the Holland Park 2000 ruleset was released, the Fifth Quadranters grudgingly disbanded, on the grounds that the offensive features of the Amendments had been finally been altered to an acceptable state or removed. In fact, Holland Park 2000 does still use a 'central' quadrant five, but it appears the Quadranters have been able to reconcile themselves to it by referring to it as the hub. In fact, Holland Park 2000 retains about a third of the Finsbury Amendments, including the actual Finsbury Option itself, which gave the Amendments their name but only ever formed a minor part of them.

Changed: 5c7
Rumours that a few of the former Quadranters have banded together, allied with the remnant of the discredited CAMREC "old guard" of the 1960s, and infiltrated the IMCS to sabotage the discussions of revisions and updates to HP2000 and thus the credibility of the IMCS (widely perceived as the victors in the disputes), by introducing errors into the final typesetting and turning an "official blind eye" to logical inconsistencies, have been explicitly denied. (Despite the re-emergence, after the second set of amendments, of the notorious Mornington Crescent Loop - hastily re-disabled in the third set of amendments, barely a week later.)
Rumours that some of the former Quadranters had banded together with remnants of the discredited CAMREC 'old guard' of the 1960s, and infiltrated the IMCS have been explicitly denied. Their intention was supposedly to sabotage the discussions of revisions and updates to Holland Park 2000 and thus erode the credibility of the IMCS by introducing errors into the final typesetting and turning an 'official blind eye' to logical inconsistencies. On the whole, the IMCS has generally been viewed as the victor in most of its recent clashes with CAMREC. This remains the case in spite of the brief re-emergence of the notorious Mornington Crescent Loop in the second round of the Holland Park 2000 amendments. The problem was hastily corrected in the third set of amendments, issued barely a week later.

Changed: 9c11
Categories: A to Z
Categories: A to Z

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
Search: