[Home]History of Finsbury Option '88

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences

The Encyclopaedia has now been locked; contributors must log in to make changes. [more]

Revision 4 . . (edit) March 29, 2007 10:12 pm by Simons Mith
Revision 2 . . September 20, 2004 1:53 am by JLE
Revision 1 . . September 20, 2004 1:36 am by JLE
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 1c1
The most succesful and widely accepted of the amendments to the Chalk Farm '84 ruleset, bringing in (among other things) the existence of [Quadrant 5]? to hold the Jubilee extension and Docklands lines. There was talk of making this amendment part of the official rules, and the main argument against it is the semantic problem of having 5 Quadrants (of course we all know what "quadrant" means.)
A wide-ranging package of amendments, posed by a more radical-reforming faction in the IMCS when members of that faction won election to positions of importance in the organisation. Forward-thinking to the point of being unacceptable to more than a few traditionalists (even from within the IMCS itself, and from the conservative OISMCS, let alone CAMREC) the amendments proposed at a meeting in Finsbury in 1988 were named after a comparatively simple and effective piece of praiseworthy good sense known as the Finsbury Option - possibly in order to distract attention from the other, more controversial amendments which were also included. For, among other things, one of the other less-publicised amendments - but one which became famous very quickly due to the opposition it received - was the creation of Quadrant Five to hold the Jubilee extension and Docklands lines. There was talk of making this amendment part of the official rules, and the main argument against it is the semantic problem of having five quadrants (of course we all know what 'quadrant' means.)

Changed: 3c3
For that reason alone, it was superseded eventually when a new ruleset came out, a couple of years after the Jubilee extension opened properly. The actual "Finsbury Option" which gave its name to the Amendments, despite forming only a minor part of them, was accepted (on the grounds that it was a simple and effective piece of praiseworthy good sense), although the Five Quadrants question required an entirely different answer to be acceptable to at least the moderate wing of CAMREC.
Nevertheless, Finsbury soon became the most widely accepted (by individual tournaments and players) of the proposed amendments to the Chalk Farm '84 ruleset, because the supposed problems with it were more about semantics than gameplay. But it never gained CAMREC acceptance, and remained controversial even among the more conservative members of the IMCS. For that reason alone, it was superseded eventually when a new ruleset came out, a couple of years after the Jubilee extension opened properly. The actual "Finsbury Option" which gave its name to the Amendments, despite forming only a minor part of them, was accepted, although the Five Quadrants question required an entirely different answer to be acceptable to at least the conservative elements of the IMCS and the moderate wing of CAMREC.

Changed: 5c5,7
[JLE]
[JLE]


Categories: A to Z, Rulesets

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
Search: