Rubicon Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 01, 2008, 11:07:31 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Undeletable components are now shaded blue when loading a level in.
3899 Posts in 197 Topics by 2405 Members
Latest Member: Ping
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Rubicon Forum
|-+  Playing the Game
| |-+  Custom Puzzle Levels (Moderator: Bucky)
| | |-+  Timbo's puzzle
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Print
Author Topic: Timbo's puzzle  (Read 8634 times)
Timbo
Designer
***
Posts: 75


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #15 on: June 09, 2007, 05:20:10 PM »

New Puzzle

More Binary: madasez
Logged
jf
Director
*****
Posts: 480


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2007, 07:07:10 PM »

For More Binary madasez: xokydug
« Last Edit: June 11, 2007, 07:11:47 PM by jf » Logged
geej66
Designer
***
Posts: 53


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #17 on: June 11, 2007, 07:14:43 PM »

More Binary (madasez) solution: nyvesas
Logged
Timbo
Designer
***
Posts: 75


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #18 on: June 12, 2007, 08:49:02 AM »

I didn't thought sombody would create a new solution for More Binary, I thought everybody would imageuse their old solution with barrels and put something to make a crate out of the barrel to the end, something like dakokas

New Puzzles
One Bit I:fygicyr
One Bit II:magocan
One Bit III:pybakem

They are solveable, but the solution isn't always short. My solution for One Bit III needs im worst case 9k Frames
« Last Edit: June 12, 2007, 08:51:06 AM by Timbo » Logged
geej66
Designer
***
Posts: 53


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #19 on: June 12, 2007, 05:01:11 PM »

Bit I solution - zidesyd
Logged
jf
Director
*****
Posts: 480


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #20 on: June 13, 2007, 09:08:38 AM »

For One Bit III pybakem: togetob.

The worst case time to solve is 8260 ticks. It might be possible to cut that in half imageby using odd-tick/even-tick to identify the "high-order" crate as 0..7 vs. 8..F, for example, if the winch is triggered on an odd tick, then add 8 to whatever value the third crate comes up as -- cf. http://kevan.org/rubicon/forums/index.php/topic,68.msg1942.html#msg1942.

« Last Edit: June 13, 2007, 09:16:51 AM by jf » Logged
jf
Director
*****
Posts: 480


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #21 on: June 14, 2007, 09:12:11 PM »

For One Bit I fygicyr: felireh.

For One Bit II magocan: novidac. The worst-case time to solve is 247 ticks, which I challenge others to beat.  Smiley imageThe winch carries two bits of information along with signaling the elapsed time, letting me cut the worst-case time by a factor of 4.
« Last Edit: June 14, 2007, 09:41:52 PM by jf » Logged
Timbo
Designer
***
Posts: 75


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #22 on: June 15, 2007, 06:35:51 PM »

challenge accepted: One Bit II: lavisux worst case: 167 ticks
Logged
Rene
Director
*****
Posts: 444


View Profile Email
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #23 on: June 17, 2007, 08:34:15 PM »

challenge accepted: One Bit II: lavisux worst case: 167 ticks


Superbly well done, Timbo! I had a very hard time achieving a better score. I especially like your full speed counter  Shocked.

For One Bit II ([level][/level]): zokimar (worst case: 158 ticks)
Logged
Timbo
Designer
***
Posts: 75


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #24 on: June 18, 2007, 05:13:13 PM »

Some optimizations later my solution needs 157 ticks worst case: hidybeb
Edit: And even faster: dyfaxyr 154 ticks worst case.
« Last Edit: June 19, 2007, 09:03:46 AM by Timbo » Logged
Rene
Director
*****
Posts: 444


View Profile Email
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #25 on: June 29, 2007, 09:24:18 PM »

Some optimizations later my solution needs 157 ticks worst case: hidybeb
Edit: And even faster: dyfaxyr 154 ticks worst case.

I could not let that go unchallenged  Wink  : perezav   -- worst case 151 ticks
It's really down to counting ticks now.

And zaxifeh -- worst case 147 ticks.
I have used Timbo's full-speed counter now. There is still some room for improvement, but I couldn't get the initialization fast enough. Maybe I have a look at it later.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2007, 07:31:44 PM by Rene » Logged
Timbo
Designer
***
Posts: 75


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #26 on: July 01, 2007, 10:45:19 PM »

I don't think I can speed up my machine to be as fast as zaxifeh
That's why I have looked at Rene's initialization and improved it: picyguk Worst case 144 ticks
I had to replace most of the lower part.
p.s. zaxifeh doesn't solve the problem for 3 0, but that is easily corrected
Logged
Rene
Director
*****
Posts: 444


View Profile Email
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #27 on: July 02, 2007, 07:19:48 PM »

Well done, Timbo. You improved exactly those points that I had problems with: synching the even and odd counters at startup, the initialization down-pipe for the '1', and the 'D' comparison at the bottom.  Nice small solutions for the top, and an inventive one for the bottom.
It is surprising how close we got to the theoretical limit of 128 ticks.
Logged
adept
Designer
***
Posts: 61


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #28 on: July 26, 2007, 05:52:23 PM »

Been out of town and computer crashed.

Anyway- here is a solution to binary: ginegac

I took all my math before binary and hex were taught much so looking at the other solutions is teaching me a lot
Logged
Timbo
Designer
***
Posts: 75


View Profile
Re: Timbo's puzzle
« Reply #29 on: November 10, 2007, 02:14:50 PM »

NEW PUZZLES:
Periodical I: fusebek
Periodical II: tuhyfod
Periodical III: hivifig
Periodical IV: cabobos

The last two a really hard, but solvable.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Rubicon Forum | Powered by SMF 1.0.8.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!