|
jf
|
For Negative Image 4, I saved with an extra piece: danarof. Key was tough until I let go of my partial solution and started over -- unlocked spaces could be a red herring -- my solution: nulalal
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sly
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Okay, think of a number. Now, scratch that number and think of 0. You're thinking of zero, right? FrEaKy
|
|
|
|
jnz
|
Nice solutions for Key everyone. Here's my original solution that proved to me it was solvable: mubolok. I've since come up with a tighter solution so here's Key 2: vufogix
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucky
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
That is the most ingenious method of solving an impossible puzzle that I have ever seen.
|
|
|
|
adept
|
Key 3 sahomyp Maybe not that easy to people not named Bucky
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jf
|
For Key 3 ( pysomyz): nugolis. Good puzzle -- it really gets down to subtleties with these tiny puzzles.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jnz
|
Reverse Shuffle: zatodosSince nobody has solved Pseudo-Random 0 ( vatedar), I'll supply a hint: It can be solved using only girders
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 07, 2007, 05:10:32 PM by jnz »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rene
|
For Key 3 ( pysomyz): xicited - Nice little one I am surprised there are so many different solutions for this one For Reverse Shuffle ( zatodos): gyfidabThat was an easy one - I guess there is a follow-up?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 07, 2007, 05:47:41 PM by Rene »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rene
|
Since nobody has solved Pseudo-Random 0 ( vatedar), I'll supply a hint: It can be solved using only girdersI have a solution that solves all but the left-most crate. That solution uses more than only girders: serabyt, and I used a Java program to calculate what sequence of crates it should produce. Are you 100% sure that it can be solved with only girders?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jnz
|
For Reverse Shuffle ( zatodos): gyfidabThat was an easy one - I guess there is a follow-up? Sure, why not? Reverse Shuffle 2: bugusysAre you 100% sure that it can be solved with only girders? Just checked again and my original solution still works.  I'll provide another hint if needed but not quite yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rene
|
Just checked again and my original solution still works.  I'll provide another hint if needed but not quite yet. No need... here is the solution: For Pseudo Random-0 ( vatedar): degohan I solved it with another Java program. My original program was fooled by the gap between the 2 and the 9
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sly
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Okay, think of a number. Now, scratch that number and think of 0. You're thinking of zero, right? FrEaKy
|
|
|
|
jnz
|
For Pseudo Random-0 ( vatedar): degohan I solved it with another Java program. My original program was fooled by the gap between the 2 and the 9I thought that might be the case. I put that in specifically to frustrate simulation. I guess it worked.  I should also mention that I'm impressed with your almost-solution posted earlier. I was hoping somebody would come up with a solution other than my original even though I thought it unlikely that one existed. Five out of six is very nice indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|