|
Pages: 1 [2]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: jnz's Puzzles (Read 3426 times)
|
|
jf
|
Oops!  Well then, back to the drawing board... Edit> For Triangular Numbers 2 ( lakifuk), sans copiers: cazudukOooh, so close! You just need one more barrel in the stack for when the crate is a 5. Argh! Testing was light. suxarux(I had another solution recently that was one barrel light -- oh that's it over in Werbad's Puzzles, caught by Timbo. I keep the barrel count down to reduce my carbon footprint.)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
immibis
|
For Triangular Numbers 2: dybasibYou have no idea how long it took me to solve that. Actually, neither do I. Worst case is 0 (954 ticks). Best case is 6 or E (285 ticks).
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 06, 2008, 07:30:08 AM by immibis »
|
Logged
|
Those physics detectors might make more impossible puzzles even more impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Werbad
|
For One Away ( retogud): gavatonI would like to see someone solve this level in the "correct" order.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jf
|
For One Away ( retogud): butysurI won't look at Werbad's solution yet. I would like to see if I can come up with a "proper" solution.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Werbad
|
For One Away ( retogud): xidamyn (Solves in numerical order) This was a real challenge, barely had enough room pretty much everywhere. I'm only disappointed with the 8 placement since it has to pass under the matcher once. The hardest thing with this level is getting the dozer back up to the top after solving the 7 crate.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 31, 2008, 05:00:28 PM by Werbad »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jnz
|
Nice solutions everyone. And solving it in numerical order is quite a feat, Werbad! Here's my solution (in non-numerical order): For One Away ( retogud): gomogogI kinda contrived the level a bit so this would be possible. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2]
|
|
|
 |